Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Kejagung Sudah Punya Alat Bukti di Kasus Pengadaan Laptop Rp9,9 Triliun



loading…

Kejagung disebut sudah memiliki alat bukti kasus dugaan korupsi laptop berbasis Chromebook di Kemendikbudristek periode 2019-2023. Foto/SindoNews

JAKARTA – Pakar Hukum Universitas Trisakti Abdul Fickar Hadjar melihat Kejaksaan Agung (Kejagung) sudah memiliki alat bukti dalam kasus dugaan korupsi laptop berbasis Chromebook di Kemendikbudristek periode 2019-2023. Abdul Fickar menyebut, hingga kini sudah beberapa orang diperiksa Kejagung terkait kasus tersebut.

“Alat bukti sudah ada, beberapa orang kan sudah diperiksa, kemudian bukti surat menyuratnya juga pasti ada itu. Sekarang kesimpulan siapa yang bertanggung jawab,” kata Abdul Fickar, Minggu (29/6/2025).

Abdul Fickar mengatakan, jika melihat kasusnya, penyelidikan perkara ini bertumpu pada peran staf khusus Nadiem Makarim, yaitu Fiona Handayani (FH), dan Juris Stan (JS), serta Ibrahim Arief (IA). Tapi di sisi lain, lanjutnya, belanja sebuah kementerian lebih banyak dilakukan oleh aparatur pelaksananya.

Baca juga: Nadiem Makarim Dipanggil Kejagung Hari Ini, Dipastikan Bakal Hadiri Pemeriksaan

“Seperti dirjen, direktur, atau sekjen. Sebenarnya ini yang lebih operasional,” jelas Abdul Fickar.



You May Also Like

Tinggalkan Balasan

Alamat email Anda tidak akan dipublikasikan. Ruas yang wajib ditandai *